Russia under the first Romanovs from Cambridge history of Russia, volume 1 (fb2) читать постранично, страница - 3

youthful, pious ruler.^[15] Bowing to pressure, Morozov and the tsar's father-in-law were exiled (only to return shortly), corrupt officials (or at least those the crowd said were corrupt) were brutally executed and the tsar resolved to reform the state in such a way as to make sure such things never happened again.

Alexis turned to the able Prince N. I. Odoevskii for help. He headed a commission designed to solve all the unattended problems faced by Muscovy at one bold, legislative stroke. Perhaps recalling his father's fondness for public input (it had saved them in 1613), Alexis called a massive assembly of 'all kinds of people' in Moscow for this purpose. In hindsight, it was a risky move for an immature leader still reeling from his first taste of popular protest. But the commission did its monumental work, the public acclaimed it, and Muscovy had a roadmap to permanent order - the Sobornoe Ulozhenie of 1649, one of the largest law codes of the early modern period. Like all successful compromises, there was something in it for everyone (or at least everyone who mattered): the powerful had their places next to the tsar affirmed; the gentry received the right to pursue runaway serfs and slaves as long as necessary to return them; and the common urban folks were promised that the corruption would be punished to the fullest extent of the law (which was, we should note, quite far).²² Again, peace reigned at court and in the country. Save two periods of

Table 19.1. The early Romanovs

Roman Iur'evich Zakhar'in

Nikita Anastasiia

IVAN IV d. 1584

FEDOR r. 1584-98 Fedor (Patriarch Filaret) d. 1633

..m. (2) Natal'ia Naryshkina

MICHAEL r. 1613-45

ALEXIS m. (1) Mania Miloslavskaia . r. 1645-76

IVAN V r. 1682-96 FEDOR r. 1676-82

Sophia Regent, 1682-9

PETER I ('the Great') r. 1682-1725

urban unrest brought on by debasement of the silver with copper (1656 and 1662), all was quiet. Or so it appeared. Under the calm surface, however, an important struggle was occurring at the very heart of Muscovite high politics.

The greatest cause of Alexis's reign (and his greatest triumph) was the Thirteen Years War, his effort to recoup the losses suffered at the hands of the hated Poles. Personally marching off to battle in 1654, he took a direct interest in making sure his crusade was brought off successfully. In the course of his campaigning, Alexis must (and here we are speculating) have judged for himself the merits (and demerits) of his soldiers, for he came back to the capital devoted to the idea of reforming, if not overturning, the existing political order.^[16] In the context of a rapidly evolving administrative and military situation, the traditional boyar elite had become distinctly less useful. Even men of low status did not respect them, as Kotoshikhin's unflattering portrait demonstrates.²⁴ Talented men - regardless of birth - who were willing to serve and serve well were needed. Given the rules of appointment to the boyar ranks, such 'new men' had no chance to attain the highest honours. Merit was not being rewarded, at least not in the way Alexis believed it should be. Obviously, the rules had to be changed so as to allow the entry of the 'new men'.^[17]

The tsar did not bring the 'new men' into the duma all at once. He could not do so without risking a costly and dangerous political battle with the old elites. Rather, he pursued a conservative approach, appointing a few 'new men' at time. But even here his options were limited by the hold of the old elites over the upper ranks. Alexis knew that they would probably grumble if he promoted men oflower status to the highest ranks in the duma orders, forthese were the traditional preserve of the old elite. Neither could Alexis make the more honourable of the 'new men' conciliar secretaries (dumnye d'iaki), for that rank was deemed too low for the hereditary servitors in the sovereign's court. Therefore Alexis opted for a strategy that would at once appease the hereditary boiarstvo and permit him to promote the 'new men': he transformed the rank of conciliar courtier (dumnyi dvorianin). The chronology of events is telling. In 1650, Alexis took the unprecedented step of appointing a fifth man to dumnyi dvorianin. Prior to that act, the largest number of dumnye dvoriane had been four (in 1634 and 1635), and ordinarily there had only been one. By the first year of the war, there were eight of them. During the war, he promoted sixteen more. Among them we find many of Alexis's 'new men'.^[18] During the war the tsar began to promote his dumnye dvoriane into the ranks of okol'nichie.²⁷ One of them, A. L. Ordin-Nashchokin, was made boyar in 1667 and served as effective prime minister until 1671. In that year another 'new man', A. S. Matveev, took his place, though he was not promoted to boyar until 1674.²⁸

Under Alexis, then, two prominent 'new men' came to rule Russia. Others exercised less visible but no less important roles as leaders in the chancellery system. In all, Alexis appointed forty-eight low-status 'new men' to the duma ranks. As we can see in Figure 19.3, the tsar entrusted them with a great number of Muscovy's highest administrative offices.^[19]

Particularly notable is the fact that Alexis placed his 'new men' in the most important prikazy: the Military Service Chancellery (Razriad), arguably the most powerful prikaz in seventeenth-century Muscovy; the Service Land Chancellery (Pomestnyi prikaz), which administered estates given to the gen­try throughout Russia; and the Ambassadorial Chancellery (Posol'skii prikaz), which controlled Muscovy's foreign affairs.³⁰

Alexis began the process of supplementing hereditary rank-holders with competent 'new men'.^[20] It is difficult to overestimate the impact of these appointments on the Muscovite political system. Alexis's alteration of duma appointment policy destroyed the equilibrium between the tsar and the elite families that ended the Time of Troubles. By the end of the Thirteen Years War, the tsar clearly had the upper hand in political matters. Alexis had successfully transformed the duma ranks from a royal council controlled by hereditary clans into a fount of royal patronage to be distributed as the tsar desired. The

DD > DDv > Ok > B

1646 1650 1655 Service Land [1643/4-63/4] 1646 Tsar's Workshop [1635 / 6-46 / 7]

1647 Grand Treasury [1630/1-46/7]; Ore [1641/2]; Ambassadorial [1646/7-47/8]

1648 Grand Revenue [1648 / 9-51 / 2]

1649 1664 Military Service [1648/9-63/4];

Monastery [1667/8-75/6]; New Tax District [1676/7] Kazan' Palace [1646/7-71/2]; Ambassadorial [i652/ 3-64/5]; Novgorod Tax District [1652/3-64/5]; Seal [1653/4-63/4]; Provisions [1674/5] 1655 Equerry [1646 / 7-53 / 4]

Patriarch's Court [1641/ 2-46/7, 1648/9-52/3]

Great Treasury [1634/5-61/2]; Ore [1641/ 2]

1653 Treasury [1639/40-44/5]; Ambassadorial

[1645/6-66/7]; Novgorod Tax District [1645/6-63/4]; Seal [1653/4-68/9]; Monastery [1654/5]; Seal Matters [1667/8]

Investigative [1654/5-56/7] NONE

Moscow (Zemskii) [1655/6-71/2]; Kostroma Tax District [1656/7-70/1]; Financial Investigation [i662/3-64/ 5] Moscow Judicial [1630/1-31/2]; Grand Revenue [1632/3-37/8]; Artillery [1658/9-62/3,1672/3-77/8]; Grand Treasury [1663/4-68/9]

1658 i665 i667 Ambassadorial [i666/7-70/ i]; Vladimir Tax District [1666/7-70/1]; Galich Tax District [1666/7-70/1]; Little Russian [1666/7-68/9]; Ransom [1667/8]

Name Baklanovskii, I. I. O.-Nashchokin, A. L. Anichkov, G. M. Pronchishchev, A. O. Eropkin, I. F. Elizarov, P. K. Kondyrev, Z. V Ianov, V. F. Matiushkin, I. P. Ivanov, A. I. Elizarov, F. K. Anichkov, I. M. Chistoi, N. I. Narbekov, B. F. Zaborovskii, S. I. Lopukhin, L. D. 1651 1667 1655 1655 1655 Ranks Chancelleries